cincyguy13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
- Messages
- 4,633
Sad to see you've bought into the fake news
You really don't think they do this? Why wouldn't they?
Sad to see you've bought into the fake news
I don't really care that much about the topic but I'd have a hard time believing they never do it.
You really don't think they do this? Why wouldn't they?
I guess it could be completely random chance that some of these matchups come together, given how many games there are. But there always seem to be a few that are too good to be true.
Either way, it's not that crazy that he said this. Mick haters need to pick their battles.
agree completely. If you stay here long enough you will see some have a agenda when it comes to our coach.Either way, it's not that crazy that he said this. Mick haters need to pick their battles.
Either way, it's not that crazy that he said this. Mick haters need to pick their battles.
It's kind of funny that you can't criticize this coach who has never actually won anything without being labeled a "Mick hater".
I've given him credit where credit is due this season. This is a UC discussion board, Mick decided to elaborate when asked a simple question by the media. It came across to me as whining and excuses, to some of you it didn't. Seeing as how this is a UC discussion board I figured the group could discuss it.
It's kind of funny that you can't criticize this coach who has never actually won anything without being labeled a "Mick hater".
I've given him credit where credit is due this season. This is a UC discussion board, Mick decided to elaborate when asked a simple question by the media. It came across to me as whining and excuses, to some of you it didn't. Seeing as how this is a UC discussion board I figured the group could discuss it.
I think it's a valid discussion but then again you are saying the coach has "never actually won anything". Seems loaded...lol!
He hasn't won anything. There is reason for some to be critical. Being critical and being a "Mick hater" are two entirely different things.
When Mick wins big many of the reasons to criticize him go away.
He hasn't won anything. There is reason for some to be critical. Being critical and being a "Mick hater" are two entirely different things.
When Mick wins big many of the reasons to criticize him go away.
I will have a discussion about mick with things that actually make sense, the offense at times, him whining, not winning anything, etc.. but I don't think getting mad at this makes much senseHe hasn't won anything. There is reason for some to be critical. Being critical and being a "Mick hater" are two entirely different things.
When Mick wins big many of the reasons to criticize him go away.
I think it's a valid discussion but then again you are saying the coach has "never actually won anything". Seems loaded...lol!
There is no point which is why I've stuck to the #DumpMick narrative. If they are going to call us Mick haters for objective criticism, might as well embrace it...
There is no point which is why I've stuck to the #DumpMick narrative. If they are going to call us Mick haters for objective criticism, might as well embrace it...
He hasn't won anything. There is reason for some to be critical. Being critical and being a "Mick hater" are two entirely different things.
When Mick wins big many of the reasons to criticize him go away.