Sean Kilpatrick Eager (Koch)

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

swg

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
7,155
Location
Ohio
Mick Cronin didn’t hesitate when he was asked who would pick up the scoring slack next season in the wake of the Lance Stephenson’s decision to leave UC for the NBA after one year.

“Sean Kilpatrick is the answer for that,” the UC coach said. “That’s why he was red-shirted.”

That’s a lot of responsibility for a kid who has never played a minute of college basketball and hasn’t been in a competitive game for over a year, but Kilpatrick says he welcomes the challenge.

“I like the pressure,” Kilpatrick said. “It makes my coaches look at me a certain way, as somebody that takes the full responsibility to do whatever it takes to win. With him looking at me the same way he looks at Lance, that’s big shoes to fill, but I’m willing to do it.”

Kilpatrick said his redshirt year went quickly – “In the blink of an eye, it was over,” he said – but that’s not to say there weren’t some anxious moments when he wished he was playing, especially when the Bearcats were having trouble scoring consistently. Now that he’s gotten through the year, he’s glad he had the advantage of watching and learning for a year instead jumping right into the fray out of Notre Dame Prep in Fitchburg, Mass.

“Sitting out taught me the game and it taught me a little more about what it takes and how you have to be on this level,” Kilpatrick said.

Kilpatrick was as surprised as everyone else when Stephenson decided to make himself eligible for the NBA draft.

“It was a shocker,” Kilpatrick said. “With me and him being roommates and me and him being so close the way we were, I didn’t think that he was going to leave. But I think it was best for him and his family. I looked at it like now that he’s gone, I’ve got to pick up a lot more slack, pick up what he left.

“I’d say our attitudes are the same. We’ve got the killer instinct attitude. I don’t know if that’s because of where we’re from, but I would say that our game is different. He’s a straight, get-to-the point guy. I’m a little bit smoother.

Kilpatrick, who averaged 28.4 points, 7.0 rebounds and 6.0 assists during four years at White Plains High School, also appears more outgoing than Stephenson.

“He’s a leader,” Cronin said. “He’s got great character. He’s always been a scorer. He’s working hard on being a consistent perimeter shooter.”

Kilpatrick, who will turn 21 in January, says he’s working the mechanics of his shot and becoming a better defender.

“Coach (Larry) Davis and Coach Cronin are always telling me to shoot higher,” Kilpatrick said. “When I’m shooting, it’s like I’m shooting darts. I’m shooting right at the rim. I need a little bit more lift. Other than that, I can score the ball.”

http://cincinnati.com/blogs/uc/2010/05/03/kilpatrick-eager-to-show-what-he-can-do/
 
I hope he can come in and score...

But I really do not understand why he was red-shirted. If he is capable of scoring like Mick says he is, why is he saving him for next year? With him Lance, and before we knew how Vaughn was, Vaughn on the court, I would think that would have been a great scoring team for this past year.

The game is a lot different from High School to college. And its hard to gage a player in practice, especially when his only competitive basketball has been against his own team.

Again, I hope he does well. Just not seeing it, atleast for the first half of the season.
 
We had huge depth at guard going into the season. Cash was who we wanted starting at point and either Parker or Vaughn were going to get the rest of the minutes. Vaughn and Stephenson were going to play big minutes off the ball. Bishop was going to get a lot of time, Dixon was supposed to be a nice role player off the bench and Larry Davis was coming off a strong showing in Big East as a sophomore.

It flat out made sense to redshirt SK at the time. Now looking back, our guard play was not nearly as strong as everyone would have liked, but you can't analyze the decision to redshirt using hindsight.
 
I hope he can come in and score...

But I really do not understand why he was red-shirted. If he is capable of scoring like Mick says he is, why is he saving him for next year? With him Lance, and before we knew how Vaughn was, Vaughn on the court, I would think that would have been a great scoring team for this past year.

The game is a lot different from High School to college. And its hard to gage a player in practice, especially when his only competitive basketball has been against his own team.

Again, I hope he does well. Just not seeing it, atleast for the first half of the season.

I am sure Mick's thought process was that he plays the same position as Lance and Bishop so where are the minutes coming from at the 3? I know Mick expected Dixon and Davis to be better than they were this year. I am sure there were times where SK could have helped and Mick wished he had him at his disposal. That said, I actually still think redshirting SK was a good idea. The last few times a player has been redshirted/didn't play it has been due to injury meaning the player couldn't really practice and get better. I think SK will be better for having redshirted last year. Just my opinion.
 
We had huge depth at guard going into the season. Cash was who we wanted starting at point and either Parker or Vaughn were going to get the rest of the minutes. Vaughn and Stephenson were going to play big minutes off the ball. Bishop was going to get a lot of time, Dixon was supposed to be a nice role player off the bench and Larry Davis was coming off a strong showing in Big East as a sophomore.

It flat out made sense to redshirt SK at the time. Now looking back, our guard play was not nearly as strong as everyone would have liked, but you can't analyze the decision to redshirt using hindsight.

I guess that is my point.

He wasn't good enough to play this past year, regardless of hindsight. If he is as good as Mick thinks, I'm sure he could have found plenty of PT. It is not like Dixon was a big scorer and Larry never showed his ability to hit the jumper like we thought. Even last year. If he was going to lose PT to Parker, then i'm not seeing SK coming in and taking over the scoring roll.

I think Mick is saying this cuz he lost out on these other kids and has no scorer coming in. He is trying to take heat off himself. Eventually SK will be good. I, however am not counting on him to avg 15-20 a game.

We shall see.
 
I guess that is my point.

He wasn't good enough to play this past year, regardless of hindsight. If he is as good as Mick thinks, I'm sure he could have found plenty of PT. It is not like Dixon was a big scorer and Larry never showed his ability to hit the jumper like we thought. Even last year. If he was going to lose PT to Parker, then i'm not seeing SK coming in and taking over the scoring roll.

I think Mick is saying this cuz he lost out on these other kids and has no scorer coming in. He is trying to take heat off himself. Eventually SK will be good. I, however am not counting on him to avg 15-20 a game.

We shall see.

I'm sure Mick is pumping him up a little more but let's not forget that Mick was already pumping him up last year before we got Lance. It is not about whether he is better than another player because you never know with a freshman. If Mick knew he was going to dominate in practice like some have reported, do you think he would have redshirted him? Hindsight is 20/20.
 
Here is my question.. Will he start next year? I can only hope, because if he is a starter by his junior year, TheGreatOne will have to eat a thumb size pile of dirt.
 
Here is my question.. Will he start next year? I can only hope, because if he is a starter by his junior year, TheGreatOne will have to eat a thumb size pile of dirt.

Will he start next year? At some point I think so. I think Bishop is better off the bench and if Mick feels SK will be needed to score, I think he will see big minutes next year. I think he'll be starting by the Xavier game at the latest.
 
I guess that is my point.

He wasn't good enough to play this past year, regardless of hindsight. If he is as good as Mick thinks, I'm sure he could have found plenty of PT. It is not like Dixon was a big scorer and Larry never showed his ability to hit the jumper like we thought. Even last year. If he was going to lose PT to Parker, then i'm not seeing SK coming in and taking over the scoring roll.

I think Mick is saying this cuz he lost out on these other kids and has no scorer coming in. He is trying to take heat off himself. Eventually SK will be good. I, however am not counting on him to avg 15-20 a game.

We shall see.

That is just flat out not true. Larry Davis really turned it on in Big East play last year. It really seemed like the light was coming on. He was one of the leaders in Big East play in 3 point percentage.

Also, SK didn't lose time to Parker. Parker was seen as the back up point guard. SK is seen as a wing. He lost time to Deonte, Lance and Bishop, and maybe Dixon to an extent, but he was a disappointment this year.

Also, I think you are discounting the possibility that SK was better in practice than even our coaches expected him to be as the year went on.

I'm not saying SK is going to come in all the sudden and be a member of any all Big East team, but the argument that because he didn't play last year means he won't be any good next year is flawed to me.
 
That is just flat out not true. Larry Davis really turned it on in Big East play last year. It really seemed like the light was coming on. He was one of the leaders in Big East play in 3 point percentage.

Also, SK didn't lose time to Parker. Parker was seen as the back up point guard. SK is seen as a wing. He lost time to Deonte, Lance and Bishop, and maybe Dixon to an extent, but he was a disappointment this year.

Also, I think you are discounting the possibility that SK was better in practice than even our coaches expected him to be as the year went on.

I'm not saying SK is going to come in all the sudden and be a member of any all Big East team, but the argument that because he didn't play last year means he won't be any good next year is flawed to me.

BINGO!

I don't expect SK to be on the Big East Rookie team but it wouldn't shock me if he was either.
 
I believe Sk will be a very good player, he has to much scoring ability i think in that area he will be fine, can he Defend is my concern considering he doesnt have the best athleticism in the world? I think he red shirted Sk to make LS happy. I remember them in highschool playing against eachother and SK was calling out LS and hit like 3 threes in his face. This kid will be fine our scoring will mainly come from the guards hell if CW hits 3 quarters of his layups he would average 20 himself.
 
Cash will be a better finisher this year. It always takes some time to come back from a knee injury. In fact, he was much better at the end of the year than the beginning. If Mick can find a couple shooters in the 2011 class, Cash could be an extremely dangerous weapon. He is hard to keep out of the lane and could drive and kick all day long. Have to have shooters though.
 
That is just flat out not true. Larry Davis really turned it on in Big East play last year. It really seemed like the light was coming on. He was one of the leaders in Big East play in 3 point percentage.

When you say last year, surely you aren't talking about this past season are you? Larry Davis shot 10-48 for 3's in the Big East last year, that is 20%. I'm assuming you are talking about 08-09?
 
When you say last year, surely you aren't talking about this past season are you? Larry Davis shot 10-48 for 3's in the Big East last year, that is 20%. I'm assuming you are talking about 08-09?

I think that's a fair assumption. I can't believe anyone thinks Davis shot the ball well in the 2009-2010 season.
 
When you say last year, surely you aren't talking about this past season are you? Larry Davis shot 10-48 for 3's in the Big East last year, that is 20%. I'm assuming you are talking about 08-09?

Yeah, sorry. I was referring to his sophomore year where he shot 38% from three in Big East play.
 
I think that's a fair assumption. I can't believe anyone thinks Davis shot the ball well in the 2009-2010 season.

I think Davis would be the first to admit he didn't have the season he wanted. In spots, he was deadly, but then he would have droughts that limited his playing time. I'm sure he'll be working hard to improve upon that.
The one good thing about a new year is that it gives the players a chance to work on deficiencies.
 
Doesn't it seem really odd that Mick would say this though? It really reeks of pumping up another player because he knows the program is devoid of any good pub.

Honestly Mick doesn't have a great track record in these types of comments.
 
That is just flat out not true. Larry Davis really turned it on in Big East play last year. It really seemed like the light was coming on. He was one of the leaders in Big East play in 3 point percentage.

Also, SK didn't lose time to Parker. Parker was seen as the back up point guard. SK is seen as a wing. He lost time to Deonte, Lance and Bishop, and maybe Dixon to an extent, but he was a disappointment this year.

Also, I think you are discounting the possibility that SK was better in practice than even our coaches expected him to be as the year went on.

I'm not saying SK is going to come in all the sudden and be a member of any all Big East team, but the argument that because he didn't play last year means he won't be any good next year is flawed to me.[/QUOTE]

Again, Here is what Mick said:

Mick Cronin didn’t hesitate when he was asked who would pick up the scoring slack next season in the wake of the Lance Stephenson’s decision to leave UC for the NBA after one year.

“Sean Kilpatrick is the answer for that,” the UC coach said. “That’s why he was red-shirted.”

Now to me that is a little more than a good player off the bench or just another starter. He is counting on him to be the scorer for this team.

Mick is the one saying he is basically filling LS shoes, not me.
 
Back
Top