Who Dey Time
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 151
As much as I blame Mick for tonights game and frankly the season as a whole, the team isn't going to go anywhere with UC's veterans playing so terribly inconsistent. Dixon has been terrible all year. Wright is good for a few minutes each game and is bad for the rest. Gates just isn't good enough to put a team on his shoulders. He should have dominated today. Part of that was on the coach, but eventually the players have to quit sucking. Cash is your only PG, Dixon can be good when he takes good shots but he kills the team when he doesn't, and that's a lot. Parker airballed a freaking layup for christs sake.
The talent level on this team just isn't good enough. As much as everyone on here likes to think UC's roster is made up of all-stars, it isn't. Every player is limited in certain ways. SK isn't quick enough and has trouble handling the ball as well as being a liability on defense, Dixon can't shoot worth crap, Parker is slow and is a terrible passer, Cash is weak, injured, and can't finish if he gets touched at all. It goes on and on. If this team is going to win, it's going to come from sticking to their roles and out hustling their opponents. That's not happening now.
This is an extremely flawed argument considering that no one in the Big East, with the exception of Syracuse, has played consistent basketball over the course of the season. Go down the standings and you will see mixed results all over the place even with teams like Marquette, Georgetown and Louisville.
At the end of the season you want to be in a position to be in the top third of the league which will guarantee an NCAA spot. If UC does what it should over the last 6 they will be in a good position. But, per usual, many are going to overreact to a road loss to a very good team and try to claim that it is not just a tough day but an indictment as to where the program has been, is at and where its going under Cronin. Those who do this are reaching badly.