No matter where you stand on the Huggs/Mick issue, I think most rational people (The Living Legend and Ralph need not apply) would agree with the following:
-Huggs did a great job while at UC. He energized Bearcat fans and the team was a source of pride for the city and university.
-Huggs had his faults in running the program. Perception or not, there were issues with graduation rates and player conduct off the court. While not all of the perceptions were true, Bob didn't exactly do much to defend the program.
-On the court, the team's performance seemed to level off in his last three seasons. I believe that we were a 8-seed in 2003, a 4-seed in 2004, and a 7-seed in 2005 which all ended in 1st weekend eliminations.
-The way Huggs was fired was disgraceful to him and the school. However, those in the know back in 2005 knew the end for Huggs was coming. Bob continued to work but had stopped recruiting for UC so to speak.
-Nothing I've said above has anything to do with Mick despite the fact that some people want to lump him in with the same people who created the mess he inherited. Mick came here in 2006 and was handed an unmitigated disaster. Since then he has built the program up from nothing. Whether he has done it in an appropriate time frame has been debated ad nauseum.
-The 2010-2011 Bearcat team is one to be very proud of and should be supported fully. WHEN they win tomorrow night they will be 6-3 and in the Top 5 of the toughest league the nation has ever seen. If they can finish strong they will be back in the NCAA Tournament. Maybe that will put an end to the Huggs/Mick debate forever and we can simply move on as Bearcat fans.