Yeah, I'm not arguing that Vogt is a good perimeter or even overall defender. I'm simply saying that the stats/ratings being tossed around aren't definitive.The thing is, when Vogt is at the rim and in position, he has done very well at preventing layups. The problem is that he generally gets pulled away from the bucket pretty easily (mostly because of the scheme: man defense so he has to guard his man) and once he's pulled away he can't move well enough to get back and can't defend outside the paint.
It breaks down Literallly EVERYTHING like to an insane amount of detail that i just stop scrolling.
I saved it to PDF
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mvqk1rypmy26s9x/Synergy Sports - Print Quantified Player Report.pdf?dl=0
Once again, I think we are arguing two different things. All I want or expect Vogt to do, is play solid 1-1 defense, in the paint. For that, he’s been great. If you expect him to chase around shooters and weak side blocks, yes he will be terrible at that. He is what he is. I doubt brannen is expecting him to do these things.
We all want that man. I think every person on this board wants a better player than Chris Vogt. I can say that with certainty. But we have Vogt. I don’t know what to tell you.Apparently Vogt has had 47 shots against and attempted 70 shots. Not what I expected.
I want a center who can play good defense in the scheme. Vogt cannot in Brannen's scheme. He is abused on jump shots. He can't play help defense. Brannen apparently expects Diarra to do those things and it looks like Vogt is supposed to as well. If Brannen can find a way to scheme to protect Vogt, the do it and play Vogt. But so far he hasn't.
We all want that man. I think every person on this board wants a better player than Chris Vogt. I can say that with certainty. But we have Vogt. I don’t know what to tell you.
Thanks for sharing that. Most of the rows are blank, so it's not too bad reading through. It rates him as a "very good" post-up defender, holding opponents to 36% shooting on the block.It breaks down Literallly EVERYTHING like to an insane amount of detail that i just stop scrolling.
I saved it to PDF
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mvqk1rypmy26s9x/Synergy Sports - Print Quantified Player Report.pdf?dl=0
Thanks for sharing that. Most of the rows are blank, so it's too bad reading through. It rates him as a "very good" post-up defender, holding opponents to 36% shooting on the block.
He is "poor" against jump shots, with opponents making 11 of 22 attempts, including a whopping 10 of 17 from three.
My questions still stand about how the Synergy algorithm decides that a player is attempting a shot against Vogt. If he plays good perimeter defense and his man doesn't shoot, he gets no credit. If he helps in the paint and the ball is kicked out for a three, who's man is that?
Vogt can play. You guys capable of watching a game? Hes beem very goos for this team. Idc about any analytics.
If we go dancing. Big if. He could win us a game with his post play vs a smaller school.
Thos team bas far far far bigger issues than vogt at center
We are going to have to work with Vogt given the fact that Brannen seems to play Diara only out of necessity (even with Sorolla out).
Diara's mobility and skills should fit in very nice...so once again...there is more than meets the eye with Diara and the eye isn't saying nice things either.
I am sure he would be a better option on D but I can't really say if he is missing assignments to help etc. If we can keep Vogt in the paint he is very efficient on offense. Brannen wants quick decisions to be made and from what I can tell Diara isn't the best at making those.
We are going to have to work with Vogt given the fact that Brannen seems to play Diara only out of necessity (even with Sorolla out).
Diara's mobility and skills should fit in very nice...so once again...there is more than meets the eye with Diara and the eye isn't saying nice things either.
I am sure he would be a better option on D but I can't really say if he is missing assignments to help etc. If we can keep Vogt in the paint he is very efficient on offense. Brannen wants quick decisions to be made and from what I can tell Diara isn't the best at making those.
Diara needs players that think and play fast for him to be successful. He doesn't lack confidence, just isn't being put in position to be successful. Our PG's have to start breaking the D down, right now they are just running the offense. As long as the offense starts above the 3pt line, Diarra, and Scott will be ineffective. Our guards have to drive and DISH, not just drive and kick. Have we had any alley oops thrown from the PG position this year? That's a lack of confidence in our bigs from the PG position.
It's amazing these guys haven't figured out this friendly offense yet. They need to play with confidence and have some fun. Nobody looks like their having fun yet.
Which is why if I’m Diarra, I transfer before the end of the semester.
Brannen clearly doesn’t want to play you and you’d have 2.5 years of basketball left. If he likes UC as a school then stay. But for basketball, he should leave now for his personal development.
or he can start playing better basketball when he gets a chance?
Crazy thought
When Brooks guards him man, they score a paltry 0.72 ppp, which was better than 86% of the nation
Which is why if I’m Diarra, I transfer before the end of the semester.
Brannen clearly doesn’t want to play you and you’d have 2.5 years of basketball left. If he likes UC as a school then stay. But for basketball, he should leave now for his personal development.
If it's possible to look at last year how many 3's was brooks responsible for guarding all of last year?
im intrigued as to how our defense covers the 3 point shot with our bigs compared to how we did it last year.