I think if you go back and review the tape of the game, you'll see that the starter played another 3 minutes or so after the 15-0 start and NS had cut that lead in half at least before he inserted the subs. Now, this is purely my "eye-test" speaking here, with no data to back it up, but I fortunately kept the recording of the game, so I will follow-up with "empirical data" tonight.
The only player who played more than normal was Jenifer. He got 13 mins. Quadri only got 6. KJ was cut to 10. Deberry only got 14. Tobler got zero. So, the sub minutes weren't radically different than usual. Who cares about a 16 point difference? I think most of us do. This is a team that we would have beat by 50 earlier in the year, and should have beat by 50 last night. Mick didn't even sub much at all in the 2nd half until about 7 mins left in the game, so he was trying hard to blow the game open. Again, I go back to the eye test. If you saw anything close to the early season team that we watched, you were watching a different game than I was. But hey, everyone's eye test is different. The new cats 1st appeared in the Southeastern Louisiana game. I didn't see much different last night....except for the fist 4 minutes.