To be clear, when I say I don't want to embarrass him, I don't mean just in us intentionally trying to, I literally would prefer it be a close game. I'd would definitely take a blowout over a loss. (I'm not that wierd) But again, I'd take a 7pt win over a 20pt win. I'd like for us to get the win, without him looking bad.
I'm sure Alum and others may have a field day with that comment. As for Ralph, well he can think whatever. I'll write it out some more tomorrow. It should be a doosy for the Huggs haters. I actually dig this thread. This is a big game for a lot of UC fans but you have to walk on eggshells on other sites.
And so has the perception about UC being a powerhouse...
To be clear, when I say I don't want to embarrass him, I don't mean just in us intentionally trying to, I literally would prefer it be a close game. I'd would definitely take a blowout over a loss. (I'm not that wierd) But again, I'd take a 7pt win over a 20pt win. I'd like for us to get the win, without him looking bad.
I'm sure Alum and others may have a field day with that comment. As for Ralph, well he can think whatever. I'll write it out some more tomorrow. It should be a doosy for the Huggs haters. I actually dig this thread. This is a big game for a lot of UC fans but you have to walk on eggshells on other sites.
Not a bad league is no where near the same as the best league in the country every year.
Here is my take on this whole thing:
I loved Bob Huggins while he was at UC and I still like to see him do well. I was pulling hard for him in the Tourney last year and I was really hoping he would finally get that elusive NCAA Title as bittersweet as it would have been. He was always nice to me any time I saw him on campus and I was there during some great years (Kenyon's senior year was my freshman year). When Bob was fired, I was pissed. I thought the timing was ridiculous and I knew that going through the year with an interim coach that wasn't recruiting for UC was going to set the program back big time. I wrote letters to the athletic department expressing my displeasure for how the whole thing went down and when it went down. I wanted to hate UC forever for what they did but I couldn't. I love the university way too much for that but I was concerned that UC Basketball would never be good again. As much as I hated having to defend the program to other fans because of the media sensationalism on many things (like the thug perception), I hated the thought of having a crappy team more.
And then Mike Thomas hired Mick Cronin. I was among the many fans who booed Mick every time he came back to UC with Louisville. I booed because the recruiting was never as good after he left and I couldn't believe a UC grad would do that to his alma mater. And then I thought about why he left and whether I would have done the same thing in his situation. The answer was yes. Mick left because he wanted to be a head coach and Pitino has a better record of getting his assistants head coaching jobs than Huggins did. You have to look out for number 1 first. Did it hurt as a UC fan? Absolutely it did, but when the program was at it's lowest and no one wanted the job, Mick Cronin wanted it. He wanted it despite Pitino's advice that it wasn't a good job to take right now. He wanted to be the guy to bring UC back to where it should be on the national stage. How can you not love and appreciate the guy for that? As much as we all hate to admit it, UC is not a destination job for any coach except for Mick Cronin. If he does well, he could be our Jim Boeheim or Coach K. Mick won't ponder leaving UC for WVU like Huggins did at least once. He will be a lifer here. We may never find a football coach who feels so strongly about this university as Mick Cronin does. Why people don't want to give him every benefit of the doubt is unbelievable to me.
I will continue to give Mick every benefit of the doubt until he proves to me he is undeserving. I think he is a heck of a coach and his recruiting history speaks for himself. Players like playing for him and other coaches respect him for what he has done at UC. However this works out for him, I will always be appreciative for what he did for the program when it was at it's lowest. I don't think another coach could have done what he has done so far. I want UC to win every game by 30, whether it is against Huggins or not. It's nothing against Huggs but I just want to see domination every night out. I know that is an unrealistic expectation but there's no reason not to hope for it.
Sorry for the long winded response, but now you all know where I stand on this topic.
Bob Huggins in 16 years: 2 elite 8 appearances, 1 final four
Mick Cronin in 4 years: nothing.
One of the best posts EVER penned at BCT. This is exactly how I feel, and most of us(IMO) feel. The vitriol against Cronin by certain posters is difficult to understand. There is certain personal nature about it, and it has nothing to do with basketball. I have my opinion on this, and voiced it earlier last week, and will not derail this thread with this. Suffice to say, those who are rooting against Cronin are rooting aginst the long term inerests of the program.
Bob Huggins at UC 399–127 (.759)
Bob Huggins is the winning est coach in UC history. Mick has alot to live up to, to reach the level of success Bob brought to the program.
Mick Cronin at UC 77–70 (.523)
Bob Huggins in 16 years: 2 elite 8 appearances, 1 final four
Mick Cronin in 4 years: nothing.
Good point. Proving that his first four were impressive in a rebuilding process. what about micks?
Injuries played a key role in Bobs lack of success later on.
Nick Aldridge. Careful though, Huggy recruited him before leaving. (Someone will come at you with that fact) But yeah, Cronin went after him at WCU of course too.
And so has the perception about UC being a powerhouse...
So taking a team, from the greatest conference ever assembled, to a single Elite Eight is more impressive than taking a team from the Great Midwest to a Final Four and an Elite Eight? (Not counting those other 12 years that mean nothing to you...) I could see how making the dance may be harder out of one conference, but how does that affect the tourney production once they get there? It seems you put so much stock in it. (Izzo >>>>>Huggs) Why not in this scenario? Double standard?
Micks BE record is 28-47.
Bob dominated CUSA (which was not a bad league by any means) and is the sole reason UC is in the big east.
i'll see Lance and raise you Bud Mackey, Geron Johnson, Nick Aldridge, Darren Goodson, and Aaron Thomas off the top of my head
Huggins stated with 4 big time recruits left to him by Tony Yates; Keith Starks, Lou Banks, Lavertis Robinson, Andre Tate. The cupboard was not bare, Huggins was not facing the loss of 3 scholarships because Yates had not put UC basketball in APR jail, they did not have APR back then.
Huggins got the same at WVU, John Belein left a stacked house to Huggins, DeShawn Butler, Muzulla, Flowers, Thorughman, the guy that went to the NBA the year before that I cannot remember his name.
Mick was left 6 cell phones, zero players, and some frequent flyer miles to go recruit with.